provided nine suggestions for creating an appropriate PTSD assessment battery that takes the setting, population, and application into account. In line with a multimethod assessment approach, Weathers et al. Further, because it cannot be used to reliably discriminate those with PTSD from those without PTSD, psychophysiological assessment may not be informative at the individual level. An important caveat of collecting psychophysiological data, however, is that collecting such data requires extensive training and expensive equipment. As such, clinicians should strive to employ multiple methods of assessment to adequately capture data from the three response systems (self-reported emotional experience, expressive behavior, and objective physiological indicators of distress or arousal during the treatment of those with PTSD). Although research has shown that using the SUDs in this fashion is an appropriate clinical practice, clinicians should not assume that an individual’s self-report of distress can completely substitute for objective measurement of physiological arousal to trauma-related stimuli. For example, clinicians’ use the Subjective Units of Discomfort scale (SUDs) to determine patients’ level of distress during imaginal and in vivo exposure exercises. Specifically, self-report instruments have fixed item content and rating scale formats, and their accuracy is contingent upon the patient understanding each item and answering truthfully.Īssessment in the context of treatment is not limited to the measurement of symptoms of PTSD and psychiatric comorbidity. Self-report measures of PTSD symptomatology can be used when time and resources are scarcer but they have their own limitations. However, because such structured interviews are time-consuming and must be administered by a trained clinician, it may not be feasible to administer them in every situation. Structured, standardized diagnostic interviews are considered the “gold standard” for assessing PTSD symptoms. In addition, we discuss how the recent introduction of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) has affected assessment in the context of treatment.Īssessment of PTSD can be conducted using a range of available instruments, each possessing varying strengths and weaknesses. In this review, we briefly describe how to construct an appropriate PTSD assessment battery and the importance of using this battery or components of this battery throughout treatment. This oversight is noteworthy in that careful assessment is crucial to identifying an appropriate treatment, monitoring progress throughout the treatment, and determining whether additional interventions are warranted after the completion of treatment. Further, adjunctive treatment with atypical antipsychotics for patients who are unresponsive to SSRIs and SNRIs has shown some promise.Īlthough researchers have devoted considerable attention to developing treatments for PTSD, less attention has been given to the role of assessment in the successful treatment of PTSD. Although generally not as effective as cognitive-behavioral treatments, empirical evidence does support the use of both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as first-line treatments for PTSD. Pharmacotherapy has also been used as an intervention for PTSD. Of these, the cognitive behavioral therapies have received the most empirical support, particularly prolonged exposure (PE), cognitive processing therapy (CPT), and Stress Inoculation Training (SIT). Therefore, the field has focused its attention on developing a range of treatments that can successfully reduce PTSD symptoms. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating condition, which if left untreated, can persist for many years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |